On 1/24/07, Nick Maclaren <nmm1 at cus.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > Obviously, Unix and Microsoft systems depend on signals, so you > can't simply regard them as hopelessly broken, but you can't assume > that they are RELIABLE. All code should be designed to cope with > the case of signals getting lost, if at all possible. Defending > yourself against the other failures is an almost hopeless task, > but luckily they are extremely rare except on specialist systems. I couldn't agree more. I might have misused the word "reliably". At first glance I thought the signal was being lost but then I've discovered what was really happening. Regards, -- Ulisses
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4