On Tuesday 23 January 2007 22:27, Tim Peters wrote: > Which is why I don't want binary or decimal floats to support > infix "%" as a spelling in P3K. I don't believe floating mod is > heavily used, and if so there's scant need for a one-character > spelling -- and if there's a method or function name to look up > in the docs, a user can read about what they're getting. While I agree with this, my only slight concern is that under 2.x (int/int)%(int) will work, while it will fail under 3.x, because int/int will return a float. Eh - we can always make 2.6 warn about the floatobject's __mod__ function being called if the -W py3k option is on, that gets us part of the way there. And if we have a "-3" option or the like that also turns on maximum 3.x compat, that will enable true division, producing the warning. Like I said, it's only a slight concern... -- Anthony Baxter <anthony at interlink.com.au> It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4