On 1/16/07, Neal Norwitz <nnorwitz at gmail.com> wrote: > > http://python.org/sf/1637022 points out a problem caused by the lack > of a _Py prefix on Ellipsis. Most (all?) of the new AST names are not > prefixed. These are all meant to be internal names. Are there any > issues with changing this? If we do so, it means that any module > built with 2.5 that is using these names will fail to work in 2.5.1. > No code outside the core *should* be using these names. It makes me terribly uncomfortable, as removing symbols is absolutely not something that should happen in a bugfix release, but I think that, in this case, it is the right thing to do. Well, the least-wrong thing to do. If only C had more visibility control, sigh ;-P -- Thomas Wouters <thomas at python.org> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20070117/7bd49343/attachment.html
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4