RetroSearch Browse

Fri Jan 12 11:12:21 CET 2007 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-January/070573.html

Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> writes:

> Armin Rigo schrieb:
>> Hi Paul,
>> 
>> On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 11:10:10PM +0000, Paul Moore wrote:
>>> How many other projects/packages anticipate *not* migrating to Py3K, I wonder?
>> 
>> FWIW: Psyco.
>
> What will PyPy do? It will certainly support compiling Py3k code at some point,
> but will the codebase itself be converted?

For practical reasons (we have enough work to be getting on with) PyPy
is more-or-less ignoring Python 2.5 at the moment.  After funding and
so on, when there's less pressure, maybe it will seem worth it.  Not
soon though.

Cheers,
mwh

-- 
  I'm okay with intellegent buildings, I'm okay with non-sentient
  buildings. I have serious reservations about stupid buildings.
     -- Dan Sheppard, ucam.chat (from Owen Dunn's summary of the year)

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-January/070573.html below:

[Python-Dev] [Python-3000] Warning for 2.6 and greater