RetroSearch Browse

Wed Jan 3 18:38:35 CET 2007 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-January/070440.html

On 1/3/07, Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at acm.org> wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 January 2007 11:06, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
>  > In #1626545, Anton Tropashko requests that object.h should be
>  > renamed, because it causes conflicts with other software.
>  >
>  > I would like to comply with this requests for 2.6, assuming there
>  > shouldn't be many problems with existing software as object.h
>  > shouldn't be included directly, anyway.
>
> +1

Maybe this should be done in a more systematic fashion? E.g. by giving
all "internal" header files a "py_" prefix?

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-January/070440.html below:

[Python-Dev] Renaming Include/object.h