skip at pobox.com wrote: > Given that you have more uses of zip/izip maybe we should be discussion > syntactic support for that instead. ;-) I actually came up with an idea for that, slightly too late to get considered in the original lockstep-iteration debate: for (x in seq1, y in seq2): ... -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4