A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-February/070857.html below:

[Python-Dev] dict(keys, values)

[Python-Dev] dict(keys, values)Brian Quinlan brian at sweetapp.com
Thu Feb 1 10:36:53 CET 2007
George Sakkis wrote:
> Perhaps this has been brought up in the past but I couldn't find it in
> the archives: far too often I use the idiom dict(zip(keys,values)), or
> the same with izip. How does letting dict take two positional
> arguments sound ?
> 
> Pros:
> - Pretty obvious semantics, no mental overhead to learn and remember it.
> - More concise (especially if one imports itertools just to use izip).
> - At least as efficient as the current alternatives.
> - Backwards compatible.
> 
> Cons:
- Yet Another Way To Do It
- Marginal benefit

Also note that the keyword variant is longer than the zip variant e.g.

   dict(zip(keys, values))
   dict(keys=keys, values=values)

and the relationship between the keys and values seems far less obvious 
to me in the keyword variant.

Cheers,
Brian
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4