Robert Kern schrieb: >> As I unification mechanism, I think it is insufficient. I doubt it >> can express all the concepts that ctypes supports. > > What do you think is missing that can't be added? I can factually only report what is missing. Whether it can be added, I don't know. As I just wrote in a few other messages: pointers, unions, functions pointers, packed structs, incomplete/recursive types. Also "flexible array members" (i.e. open-ended arrays). While it may be possible to come up with a string syntax to describe all these things (*), I wonder whether it should be done, and whether NumArray can then support this extended data model. Regards, Martin (*) perhaps with the exception of incomplete types: C needs forward references in its own syntax.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4