On 10/3/06, Steve Holden <steve at holdenweb.com> wrote: > If the brainpower already expended on this issue were proportional to > its significance then we'd be reading about it on CNN news. > > This thread has disappeared down a rat-hole, never to re-emerge with > anything of significant benefit to users. C'mon, guys, implement a patch > or leave it alone :-) Hear, hear. My proposal: only cache positive 0.0. My prediction: biggest bang for the buck, nobody's code will break. On platforms that don't distinguish between +/- 0.0, of course this would cache all zeros. On platforms that do distinguish them, -0.0 is left alone, which is just fine. -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4