On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 11:56:25AM +1100, Anthony Baxter wrote: > Looking at the patch, the functions are pretty clearly internal implementation > details. I'm happy for it to go into release25-maint (particularly because > the consequences of the bug are so dire). OK, I'll backport it; thanks! (It's not fixing a frequent data-loss problem -- the patch just assures that when flush() or close() returns, data is more likely to have been written to disk and be safe after a subsequent system crash.) --amk
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4