RetroSearch Browse

Thu Nov 9 19:54:00 CET 2006 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-November/069924.html

"A.M. Kuchling" <amk at amk.ca> wrote in message 
news:20061109140146.GB8808 at localhost.localdomain...
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 02:51:15PM +0100, andrew.kuchling wrote:
>> Author: andrew.kuchling
>> Date: Thu Nov  9 14:51:14 2006
>> New Revision: 52692
>>
>> [Patch #1514544 by David Watson] use fsync() to ensure data is really on 
>> disk
>
> Should I backport this change to 2.5.1?  Con: The patch adds two new
> internal functions, _sync_flush() and _sync_close(), so it's an
> internal API change.  Pro: it's a patch that should reduce chances of
> data loss, which is important to people processing mailboxes.

I am not familiar with the context but I would naively think of data loss 
as a bug.

The new functions' code could be preceded by a comment that they were added 
in 2.5.1 for internal use only and that external use would make code 
incompatible with 2.5 -- and of course, not documented elsewhere.

tjr

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-November/069924.html below:

[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r52692 - in python/trunk:Lib/mailbox.py Misc/NEWS