A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-May/065100.html below:

[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r46043 - peps/trunk/pep-0356.txt

[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r46043 - peps/trunk/pep-0356.txt [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r46043 - peps/trunk/pep-0356.txtDelaney, Timothy (Tim) tdelaney at avaya.com
Mon May 22 01:28:28 CEST 2006
Steve Holden wrote:

> Will it be acceptable to add new (performance) changes between Alpha 3
> and beta 1, or would developers prefer to put a fourth alpha in to the
> schedule?
> 
> The intention is there should be no major functionality added by the
> sprint, simply that performance should be improved, so the schedule
> may work. It's just a call for the release manager really, I guess.

If there's no functionality changes, what would be the problem with
putting it in post-alpha?

Tim Delaney
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4