A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-May/064927.html below:

[Python-Dev] total ordering.

[Python-Dev] total ordering. [Python-Dev] total ordering.Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Sun May 7 17:25:14 CEST 2006
On 5/6/06, Vladimir Yu. Stepanov <root at renet.ru> wrote:
[proposing a total ordering between types]

It Ain't Gonna Happen. (From now on, I'll write this as IAGH.)

In Python 3000, we'll actually *remove* ordering between arbitrary
types as a feature; only types that explicitly care to be ordered with
respect to one another will be ordered. Equality tests are unaffected,
x==y will simply return False if x and y are of incomparable types;
but x<y (etc.) will raise an exception.

--
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4