RetroSearch Browse

Mon May 1 16:32:40 CEST 2006 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-May/064696.html

On 4/30/06, Ben Wing <ben at 666.com> wrote:
> [1] ideally, change this behavior, either for 2.6 or 3.0.  maybe have a
> `local' keyword if you really want a new scope.
> [2] until this change, python should always print a warning in this
> situation.
> [3] the current 'UnboundLocal' exception should probably be more
> helpful, e.g. suggesting that you might need to use a `global foo'
> declaration.

You're joking right?

--
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-May/064696.html below:

[Python-Dev] global variable modification in functions [Re: elimination of scope bleeding of iteration variables]