Anthony Baxter <anthony at interlink.com.au> wrote: > This came up before (back in October 2004!) but didn't go anywhere > since, AFAICR. Do we want to consider including pysqlite in Python > 2.5? It's the only DB adaptor that I'd really consider suitable for > shipping with the distribution, because it's self-contained. > > What's people's thoughts? I can't help but be +1. Though I have found various uses for the btree, hash, and recno databases available via bsddb, having a built-in SQL database would be quite convenient; saving people from having to install any one of the dozen+ SQL variants for their platform in order to prototype or even develop a full system using SQL. While I haven't used pysqlite extensively, when I did, I found that it worked quite well for what I was doing. - Josiah
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4