Tim Peters wrote: > [Guido] >>> Accessor functions are typical for APIs translated too literally from >>> Java. (threading.py being an example :-( ) >>> >>> I'd like to change this as long as we're doing greenfield API design. > > [Georg Brandl] >> Does that mean to change it to attributes? >> (since I'm no professional BDFL channeler I could have misread your >> sentence ;) > > Yup, that's what it means. In addition, the "greenfield" part meant > specifically they should be changed to read-only attributes. Thank you! Changed in rev. 43196. > One trick to professional channeling is to do the Pythonic thing, and > then just pretend you read Guido's mind. Of course I'm _way_ beyond > that :-) One day, I want to become like you! ;) Cheers, Georg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4