M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > I really don't understand why you put so much effort into > trying to argue that the ssize_t patch isn't going to break > extensions or that fixing compiler warnings is good enough. Well, in *this* thread, my main point is that I don't want to provide the list that you demand, mainly because I consider it a waste of my time to create it. > I consider the fact that it's currently not possible to have > a look at the changed APIs a documentation which is in the > responsibility of the patch authors to provide (just like it > always is). It is possible to look at the changed APIs, see http://docs.python.org/dev/api/sequence.html Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4