"Christos Georgiou" <tzot at mediconsa.com> wrote: > [Christos] > > These details should be considered in the PEP. > > [Josiah] > > They aren't considered because they are *obvious* to most (if not all) > > sane people who use Python. > > I beg to disagree. I don't know whether you are Dutch or not, but most of There's probably a bit of dutch in me, but likely not sufficient to alter my language intuitions. > the Python users aren't; one of the reason PEPs exist is to explain what > *should* "be obvious at first" when one is Dutch ;-) Apart from joking, > PEPs should be a record of beating/thinking the PEP subject to its death: > "The PEP author is responsible for building consensus within the > community and documenting dissenting opinions." Considering your quote, I have thusfar not seen any opinion dissenting from what I stated as 'obvious' behavior. As I told Michael Chermside off-list: "Sure, great, clarify it. I wasn't saying anything in regards to whether it should or shouldn't [be clarified], just why it probably wasn't already." Also considering that I lack SVN commit permission, it's not within my power to clarify the PEP. - Josiah
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4