A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-June/066713.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 3103: A Switch/Case Statement

[Python-Dev] PEP 3103: A Switch/Case Statement [Python-Dev] PEP 3103: A Switch/Case StatementTalin talin at acm.org
Wed Jun 28 19:25:27 CEST 2006
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Let's just drop the switchable subroutine proposal. It's not viable.
> 

Perhaps not - but at the same time, when discussing new language 
features, let's not just limit ourselves to what other languages have 
done already.

Forget subroutines for a moment - the main point of the thread was the 
idea that the dispatch table was built explicitly rather than 
automatically - that instead of arguing over first-use vs. 
function-definition, we let the user decide. I'm sure that my specific 
proposal isn't the only way that this could be done.

-- Talin
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4