Brett Cannon wrote: > Ah, do the union of the coverage! Yeah, that would be nice and give the > most accurate coverage data in terms of what is actually being tested. > But as Titus says in another email, question is how to get that data > sent back to be correlated against. It might be interesting as a BuilBot extension: you already know the definitive identity of the thing that you're running (svn path and revision), a central server with established communication channel, plus all the other BuildBot machinery. -- Benji York
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4