Michael Urman wrote: > The fact that > round returns a float rather than an int, while intentional, does not > feature prominently in one's mine when the first version yielded the > expected results. As an aside, does anyone else think that it would be useful to have a builtin which rounds and converts to an int in one go? Whenever I use round(), I almost always want the result as an int, and making me do it in two steps seems unnecessarily bothersome. Since automatic float->int coercion is being increasingly disallowed, use cases for this are becoming more and more common. -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4