Anthony Baxter <anthony at interlink.com.au> writes: > On Friday 28 July 2006 15:32, Raymond Hettinger wrote: >> I suggest that there be a third beta release and that we then wait >> just a bit before going final. >> >> The bugs that were found and fixed in the first two beta releases >> suggest that Py2.5 is not yet as stable as we would like. Over the >> next few days, I'll try to run it on as much third-party code as >> possible. That would have detected the recently surfaced grammar >> error a little bit earlier (the one where "for x, in listOfTuples" >> would not unpack). >> >> The release process itself is going well but I don't think the >> pervasive AST changes have been fully shaken-out yet. > > I've been thinking the same thing, too. A quick chat to Neal says that > he also agrees. > > There's still a lot more bugs popping up than I'm really comfortable > with. I guess this is inevitable - there's a lot of new stuff in 2.5. > > Does anyone disagree with making the next release beta3? It seems like a good idea to me. I guess this will mean the final release will be pushed back a bit? Cheers, mwh -- Gevalia is undrinkable low-octane see-through only slightly roasted bilge water. Compared to .us coffee it is quite drinkable. -- Måns Nilsson, asr
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4