On Thursday 13 July 2006 14:46, Guido van Rossum wrote: > Thanks for confirming memory! So it was an intentional regression; > "bugs happen" doesn't apply in this case. And an unfortunate > regression at that -- not because one guy writes a silly blog entry > about it, but because it breaks real code -- undocumented be > damned. > > Are we going to fix it, without allowing those crashes again? I already said "yes" for 2.5. Brett, can you work up a patch? Anthony -- Anthony Baxter <anthony at interlink.com.au> It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4