A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-July/067244.html below:

[Python-Dev] [slighly OT] Native speakers and hurting brains

[Python-Dev] [slighly OT] Native speakers and hurting brains [Python-Dev] [slighly OT] Native speakers and hurting brainsFredrik Lundh fredrik at pythonware.com
Tue Jul 11 15:06:09 CEST 2006
Boris Borcic wrote:

>>> I believe that in this case native linguistic intuition made the decision...
>>
>> The reason has nothing to do with language. Guido didn't
>> want sum() to become an attractive nuisance by *appearing*
>> to be an obvious way of joining a list of strings, while
>> actually being a very inefficient way of doing that.
>
> sum() *is* exactly an attractive nuisance by *appearing* to be an obvious way of
> chaining strings in a list (without actually being one).

in what language the word "sum" an appropriate synonym for "concatenate" ?

</F> 



More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4