Boris Borcic wrote: >>> I believe that in this case native linguistic intuition made the decision... >> >> The reason has nothing to do with language. Guido didn't >> want sum() to become an attractive nuisance by *appearing* >> to be an obvious way of joining a list of strings, while >> actually being a very inefficient way of doing that. > > sum() *is* exactly an attractive nuisance by *appearing* to be an obvious way of > chaining strings in a list (without actually being one). in what language the word "sum" an appropriate synonym for "concatenate" ? </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4