RetroSearch Browse

Mon Jul 10 22:20:38 CEST 2006 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-July/067202.html

+1

On 7/10/06, Raymond Hettinger <rhettinger at ewtllc.com> wrote:
>
>  Tim Peters wrote:
>  [Neal Norwitz]
>
>
>  There hasn't been much positive response (in the original thread or
> here).
>
>  Do note that there was little response of any kind, but all it got was
> positive. It's not sexy, but is essential for debugging deadlocks.
> If you ask for positive response, you'll get some -- the use is
> obvious for those who need it. I didn't (and don't) think this needs
> a "sales job".
>
>
>
>  FWIW, I think this patch should go in.  The benefits are obvious and real.
> But, the imagined costs of a new feature during beta are illusory.
>
>  In this case, practicality beats pedantry.  For the users, it is a net win
> if this goes in.
>
>
>  Raymond
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org
>
>
>


-- 
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-July/067202.html below:

[Python-Dev] "Missing" 2.5 feature