On 7/9/06, Tim Peters <tim.peters at gmail.com> wrote: > Just to make life harder ;-), I should note that code, docs and tests > for sys._current_frames() are done, on the tim-current_frames branch. > All tests pass, and there are no leaks in the new code. It's just a > NEWS blurb away from being just another hectic release memory :-) There hasn't been much positive response (in the original thread or here). Given you forgot about it for over a year, how important can it be? :-) What's the justifcation to add this feature, but none of the others? Can we defer this to 2.6? n
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4