Guido van Rossum wrote: > On 7/5/06, Phillip J. Eby <pje at telecommunity.com> wrote: > > Did you also consider and reject: > > > > * Alternate binding operators (e.g. ":=", ".=", etc.) > > Brr. That's too bad :( I still find a rebinding operator (":=" being my favorite) much, *much* more appealing than any of the alternative proposals. It's beautifully symmetrical with "assignment means local". It also pretty much makes the global statement redundant. The only downside I see is that it may cause a fairly big shift in style: I for one would use := for rebinding local names. While I think that would be an improvement (eg. by catching typo's earlier), it's *different*. Just -- Change is bad. We fear change. -- Garth Algar
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4