On Sat, 1 Jul 2006, Greg Ewing wrote: > I don't disagree with anything you said, but I think it > would be a good idea to avoid using phrases like "proper > lexical scopes", which is likely to set people off on > a tangent. The issue isn't lexicality, it's writeability. "Fully functional" lexical scopes, then? Python's scopes are lexical (except for builtins) but currently somewhat hamstrung. -- ?!ng
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4