Guido wrote: > Have you studied wikipedia's approach? It's multi-layered and worth > learning from (start with their FAQ on editing). > > (And by the way, I am *not* advocating writing the docs as one big > wikipedia -- only the user commentary.) to clarify, I'm advocating maintaining the docs via a restricted wiki-like system, and using a blog-style discussion board or a wiki to collect non- specific user commentary. but it's the combination that really interests me: the ability for users to propose specific corrections (as patches, at least under the cover), and for volunteers to apply such patches with a minimum of effort. more later. </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4