On Tuesday 2006-01-17 15:19, skip at pobox.com wrote: > Alex> Identically the same situation as for int: the base argument is > Alex> only accepted if the first argument is a str (not a float, etc). > Alex> Just the same way, the base argument to str will only be accepted > Alex> if the first argument is an int (not a float, etc). > > A shortcoming in int() hardly seems like a good reason to mess with str(). How's it a shortcoming in int() that it doesn't do anything with, say, int(2.345,19)? (What would you like it to do?) Or are you saying that the fact that int(<a string>) lets you specify a base to interpret the string in is itself a shortcoming, and if so why? -- g
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4