2006/1/9, Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at acm.org>: > On Monday 09 January 2006 12:08, Facundo Batista wrote: > > What I wanted to add to the module was predicatibility: a very needed > > feature when you're writing test cases (and that's where I got bite). > > In that case, would sorting the keys within each section be sufficient when > writing it back out? Yes, because giving a set of sections and values inside them, you know in advance how they'll finish in the file. > I had a class to do the really-careful editing bit like Guido described once, > but lost it in a disk crash several years ago. I really wish I'd gotten that > into revision control somewhere, but it's too late now. I've not needed that > badly enough to re-write it. Somebody (me, for example) can write it if we all decide that that's the desired behaviour. We just need to take a side. Me, I just need the predicatibility that sort() gives. . Facundo Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/ PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4