Greg Ewing wrote: > Fredrik Lundh wrote: > > > moving to (basic) C++ might also be a good idea (in 3.0, perhaps). is any- > > one still stuck with pure C89 these days ? > > Some of us actually *prefer* working with plain C > when we have a choice, and don't consider ourselves > "stuck" with it. perhaps, but polymorphic code is a lot easier to write in C++ than in C. > My personal goal in life right now is to stay as > far away from C++ as I can get. so what C compiler are you using ? </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4