Adam Olsen wrote: > While we're at it, any chance of renaming str/unicode to text in 3.0? > It's a MUCH better name, as evidenced by the opentext/openbytes names. > str is just some odd C-ism. > > Obviously it's a form of gratuitous breakage, but I think the long > term benefits are enough that we need to be *sure* that the breakage > would be too much before we discount it. it's a very common variable name... </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4