Guido van Rossum wrote: > So how about > openbytes? This clearly links the resulting object with the bytes > type, which is mutually reassuring. That looks quite nice. Another thought -- what is going to happen to os.open? Will it change to return bytes, or will there be a new os.openbytes? -- Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+ University of Canterbury, | Carpe post meridiam! | Christchurch, New Zealand | (I'm not a morning person.) | greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz +--------------------------------------+
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4