RetroSearch Browse

Tue Feb 14 01:09:32 CET 2006 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/060872.html

On 2/13/06, Michael Foord <fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk> wrote:
> Sorry - I meant for the unicode to bytes case. A default encoding that
> behaves differently to the current to implicit encodes/decodes would be
> confusing IMHO.

And I am in agreement with you there (I think only Phillip argued otherwise).

> I agree that string to bytes shouldn't change the value of the bytes.

It's a deal then.

Can the owner of PEP 332 update the PEP to record these decisions?

--
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/060872.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 332 revival in coordination with pep 349? [ Was:Re: release plan for 2.5 ?]