RetroSearch Browse

Wed Dec 6 00:59:21 CET 2006 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-December/070226.html

Martin v. Löwis escreveu:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys schrieb:
>> In response to Martin v Loewis' initial reply we have sent in
>> contributor agreements, but nothing else has happened so far.
>>
>> I was wondering whether there is any way for me to speed up the review
>> process.
> 
> It may not be what you expect to hear, but there actually is:
> 
> If you review 5 patches, I'll review yours quickly in return.
> 

Fair enough. 

I'm not familiar with the process, python internals, and couldn't 
find much of guidelines. I also don't have permission to fiddle with the 
tracker, so here are 5 small ones that I could understand

1608267 - added comment, asking for explanation. looks bogus.
1608579 - problem analysis + solution looks good
1507247 - I can reproduce the problem it tries to fix. Fix looks ok.
1520879 - trivial fix; should go in. disregard the comment about relative --prefix
1339673 - superseeded by #1597850

-- 
 Han-Wen Nienhuys - hanwen at xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-December/070226.html below:

[Python-Dev] cross-compile patches