-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Aug 29, 2006, at 11:29 AM, Georg Brandl wrote: > There's one problem: it was thought for a long time that there > wouldn't be > any more 2.3 releases, so bug fixes were applied only in the head > and 2.4 > branch. > > If there will be a 2.3.6, it might be necessary to look at all 2.4 > branch > fixes and decide which of them are worth backporting. Right, we'll definitely have to do that, and maybe not much more. - -Barry -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iQCVAwUBRPSmuXEjvBPtnXfVAQKyegQAgpzLpPddKE03wg3orKvlHPJXFKpbaLvd 4gIRIgvqwGjKwjxY4s8Gn55axHJM8YBwJ+IbCzYg3nmBB3JvljuKNxTZtz4w781Y BS/apc8Ng+2wv/W8Eo2zVbbRformZa24H/d8Gq5Mdst1yTrcAwwcO7k1hHjAl9w8 HFIWjechAVg= =4wXb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4