RetroSearch Browse

Tue Aug 22 19:32:22 CEST 2006 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-August/068427.html

On 8/22/06, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> brett.cannon wrote:
> > Added: peps/trunk/pep-0362.txt
> > +Relation With Other PEPs
> > +========================
> > +
> > +"Keyword-Only Arguments [#pep-3102]_
> > +------------------------------------
> > +
> > +If keyword-only parameters come into existence, the Parameter object
> > +will require modification.  A ``keyword_only`` attribute will be added
> > +that holds a boolean representing whether the parameter is
> > +keyword-only or not.
>
> Why an extra attribute instead of using "x.position is None"? Unlike
> default_value, None is not otherwise a legitimate value for the position
> attribute.

OK, talked over with Jiwon and the room here at the sprint and the
preference was to keep it as-is.  Reasons were it allowed the position in
the signature to be kept with the object (and thus not be reliant on the
Signature object to know its position in the actual output), and the
possibility of disparate types being in the attribute.  Plus Guido preferred
the original way.  =)

-Brett
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20060822/3233101e/attachment.html 

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-August/068427.html below:

[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] r51458 - peps/trunk/pep-0000.txt peps/trunk/pep-0362.txt