On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 12:26:33AM +0200, Armin Rigo wrote: > Without more inspection, I'd say that this looks like it won't do the > right thing about nested finally's, as in: I guess it'll have to loop back up through the block stack: for (j=i- 1; j>=0; j--) { switch (c->u->u_fblock[j].fb_type) { case FINALLY_TRY: raise error; case LOOP: j=0; /* Exit the loop */ break; default: break; } } --amk
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4