Guido van Rossum wrote: > On 8/15/06, James Y Knight <foom at fuhm.net> wrote: > >>There's no particular reason that a short int must be able to store >>the entire range of C "long", so, as many bits can be stolen from it >>as desired. > > There isn't? Actually a lot of APIs currently assumen that. Also it means you'd pay a penalty every time you access it, whereas presumably short ints are the case we want to optimise for speed as well. -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4