A.M. Kuchling wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 12:21:34AM +0200, Georg Brandl wrote:
>> * close RFEs and patches which have no chance of going in (there are many
>> patches on SF having one or two "-1" comments, is anyone ever going to
>> check them in without a python-dev discussion?)
>
> In the past, someone (I think Raymond) has argued that we shouldn't
> close old bug reports because even if no one is interested in
> processing them *now*, someone might come along someday who wants to
> update that module and fix those bugs or apply those enhancements.
>
> Perhaps we need a 'not dead, not actively pursued' state for patches
> and RFEs.
Open with priority 0?
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4