Guido van Rossum wrote: > On 8/10/06, James Y Knight <foom at fuhm.net> wrote: >> It makes just as much sense as assigning to an array access, and the >> semantics would be pretty similar. > > No. Array references (x[i]) and attribute references (x.a) represent > "locations". Function calls represent values. This is no different > than the distinction between lvalues and rvalues in C. > Except this syntax is valid in c++ where X() is a constructor call: X(whatever) += 2; is (or can be) valid c++
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4