Martin v. Löwis wrote: > Perform it: do the steps that the algorithm says you should > do, or let a machine do it. IOW, run the code. That can't be right, because it would mean that anyone who runs a program that contains a patented algorithm, even one bought or otherwise obtained from someone else, would need to individually negotiate a licence with the patent owner. That clearly doesn't happen. > If your point is that software patents are evil: I fully > agree. My point is that software patents don't even seem to make *sense* -- especially in conjunction with open source software. -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4