RetroSearch Browse

Wed Sep 21 13:14:57 CEST 2005 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-September/056611.html

Greg Ewing wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
> 
> 
>>I think if we go with (if ... then ... else ...) or (if ...:
>>... else: ...) we'll have to support elif as well:
>>
>>(if ... then ... elif ... then ... else ...)
>>or
>>(if ...: ... elif ...: ... else: ...)
> 
> 
> One nice thing about "x if b else y" is that it
> chains without needing any more keywords:
> 
>    x if b else y if c else z
> 
> But if you require parens, it's not so nice:
> 
>    (x if b else (y if c else z))
> 

If Guido chose this form, I would expect the chaining to work like chaining 
loops in a generator expression, with parentheses being required around the 
whole thing, rather than around each element in the chain:

     (x if b else y if c else z)

The point being that the result of the conditional expression is exactly one 
of the options included in the expression, so only one set of parentheses is 
required.

Regards,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
             http://boredomandlaziness.blogspot.com

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-September/056611.html below:

[Python-Dev] Adding a conditional expression in Py3.0