On 10/16/05, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at iinet.net.au> wrote: > PEP 343 has been updated on python.org. > > Highlights of the changes: > > - changed the name of the PEP to be simply "The 'with' Statement" > - added __with__() method > - added section on standard terminology (that is, contexts/context managers) > - changed generator context decorator name to "context" > - Updated "Resolved Issues" section > - updated decimal.Context() example > - updated closing() example so it works for objects without close methods > > I also added a new Open Issues section with the questions: > > - should the decorator be called "context" or something else, such as the > old "contextmanager"? (The PEP currently says "context") > - should the decorator be a builtin? (The PEP currently says yes) > - should the decorator be applied automatically to generators used to write > __with__ methods? (The PEP currently says yes) I hope you reverted the status to "Proposed"... On the latter: I think it shouldn't; I don't like this kind of magic. I'll have to read it before I can comment on the rest. -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4