[Martin v. Löwis]
>> I'm really concerned that the same fate will happen to any new
>> profiling library: anybody but the original author will hate it,
>> write his own, and then suggest to replace the existing one.
[Fredrik Lundh]
> is this some intrinsic property of profilers? if the existing tool has
> problems, why not improve the tool itself?
How many regexp engines has Python gone through now? Profilers are
even more irritating to write and maintain than those -- and you
presumably know why you started over from scratch instead of improving
pcre, or whatever-the-heck-it-was that came before that ;-)
> do we really need CADT-based development in the standard library?
Since I didn't know what that meant, Google helpfully told me:
Center for Alcohol & Drug Treatment
Fits, anyway <wink>.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4