Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Please consider looking at and commenting on PEP 328 - I got zero feedback
> when I wrote it, and basically assumed no-one else was bothered by the -m
> switch's fairly significant limitations (it went in close to the first Python
> 2.4 alpha release, so we wanted to keep it simple).
Oops, that should be PEP 3*3*8. PEP 328 is something completely different.
That'll teach me to post without checking the PEP number ;)
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://boredomandlaziness.blogspot.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4