Martin v. Löwis wrote: > Walter Dörwald wrote: > >> So is this change wanted? useful? implementable with reasonable >> effort? Or >> just not worth it? > > I think it is just not worth it. This means I won't attempt to implement > it. I think I defined originally the __module__ attribute for classes to > support better pickling (and defined it to be a string to avoid cycles); > we considered the nested classes case at the time and concluded "oh > well, don't do that then". This sounds like this change would have a far greater chance of getting into Python if a patch existed (I guess, this is the case for all changes ;)). Bye, Walter Dörwald
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4