Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-March/052463.html below:

[Python-Dev] Re: comprehension abbreviation (was: Adding any() andall())

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: comprehension abbreviation (was: Adding any() and all())
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: comprehension abbreviation (was: Adding any() andall())
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

"Steve Holden" <steve at holdenweb.com> wrote in message 
news:d2asg9$3tf$1 at sea.gmane.org...
> Having to write
>
>     [x for x in seq]
>
> to produce a copy of a list doesn't seem that outrageous to me,

Except for (currently) leaving the last value of sequence bound to 'x' 
after making the copy, how is the above different from list(seq)?

TJR

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Re: comprehension abbreviation (was: Adding any() and all())
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Re: comprehension abbreviation (was: Adding any() andall())
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4