RetroSearch Browse

Thu Jun 30 17:31:31 CEST 2005 · http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-June/054519.html

On Thu, Jun 30, 2005, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
> If there are no objections, I propose to do the following (only in
> Python 2.4 and 2.5):
> 
>       * Add set.union_update() as an alias for set.update().
>       * Add to docstrings for all methods that 't' can be any iterable.
>       * Update texinfo documentation to add Set.update() and
>         set.union_update() and explain that all can take iterables
> 
> I consider this a bug in 2.4, not a new feature, because without it, it
> makes more work in porting applications.

+0  (I'm only not +1 because I don't use sets much -- I'm still mired in
Python 2.2 -- but I'm always happy to see inconsistencies resolved)

I'll guess that Raymond will probably want 2.5 to have set.union_update()
get a PendingDeprecationWarning.
-- 
Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com)           <*>         http://www.pythoncraft.com/

f u cn rd ths, u cn gt a gd jb n nx prgrmmng.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-June/054519.html below:

[Python-Dev] Inconsistent API for sets.Set and build-in set